Category: Politics


What would the mattress of a billionaire be like? Probably the best mattress from a luxury brand store costing 9000 US dollars up or one that is custom made costing more than what a family from the lower brackets of society could earn for a year. Now what would the mattress of people from the lower brackets of society be like? Go on and search around the web, get out of the city, or look at the city’s alleys, what do you see? Some people are homeless, some are just barely getting by – they sleep on cardboard, on mats, or on the cold hard floor.

Being stuck in our own apartment room or in the comfort of our own subdivisions makes us forget the realities of the masses – the wealth gap is increasing. Major cities have alarming rates of homeless people, developing countries such as the Philippines are faced with problems on squatters and the homeless in the major urban areas while sleeping on mats or on the floor is a pretty common practice in the more provincial areas. Even countries known for being a home to billionaires such as Hong Kong are having alarming rates in the real estate Industry leading the general masses to have only a bed for a room or an illegal settlement with improper amenities – all these and a bill with astronomical prices just for a nights rest.

Having somewhere to sleep is a basic necessity but how come quite a number of the general public can’t have access to these basic necessities? For whose interests are the laws being enforced for? Why do we prioritize foreign businessmen or big businesses over the interest of the people? Why do we sell the lives of our citizens and of our motherland? Why are laws made to be confusing or made using the language that only the upper crust of society could understand? What does this imply to the general public for those who want to speak, for those who can’t speak. The wealth gap is increasing and even if most parts of the law couldn’t be understood by the masses, the laws made for the benefit of businessmen in the guise of politicians are reflected in the realities that the masses are experiencing in their everyday lives.


Beard on Politicians

The Atlantic interviewed Rebekah Herrick, an Oklahoma State University professor who analyzed the occurrence and revealed that the motive fewer than 5 percent of Congress have cosmetic hair really would be really they don’t wish to adopt a character which may make them seem conducive to women’s problems.

According to Herrick, this is not only politicians becoming paranoid. In her analysis, female subconsciously perceived politicians using beards and mustaches as being feminist, irrespective of their real voting habits.

So how can Paul Ryan and his beard fit into all this? The Atlantic factors to other research that replicate Herrick’s findings that beards are regarded as an indication of hyper-masculinity–although also observing that girls are demonstrated to locate guys with facial hair attractive. Because Paul Ryan has made no secret from his own stance on key women’s problems (specifically, his own urge to defund Planned Parenthood) perhaps he is just cutting him hoping he could endear girls with his eponymous facial hair rather? If you request, Appears to be a very long haul.

Effect on Image of Beard on Male Politicians

Using an experimental procedure, Herrick and her coworkers revealed individuals photos of similarly emerging politicians and with a beard, asking them how they felt about the guys and their probable places.

They discovered that politicians perceived guys with facial hair to become masculine and this is a sword that was mythical. Greater ratings of masculinity were connected with perceptions of proficiency but also worries the politicians were far less favorable to their worries.

To put it differently, the more beard and knows how to stimulate beard growth (bartwuchs anregen in German translation), the more people fear that a politician may be sexist.

Actually, facial hair does not have any connection to a man fighter’s voting record. They assessed. The study indicates, however, that guys in politics — perhaps even all guys — are smart to look closely at the stereotypes should they wish to affect how others view them.

 


Last May 13, 2019, Vermont state legislators approved and passed Bill H.57, a law seeking to make abortion a constitutional right that gives women of reproductive age the freedom of choice, as well as bar public entities from interfering or limiting the right to terminate pregnancy any time and for any reason.

Republican Vermont Governor. Phil Scott supports the legislation of comprehensive abortion rights law and is expected to affix his signature of approval in order to fully enact Bill H 57.

Vermont’s passing of Bill H 57, is regarded as a proactive measure against movements seeking to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal throughout the country. Other Republican-led states across the nation have recently introduced, if not passed legislation aimed at restricting abortion procedures.

Alabama recently enacted a controversial abortion law that could imprison for life, doctors found to have performed abortions. Earlier this month, the state of Georgia enacted a law that prohibits abortion once fetal heartbeats have been detected — a condition that may take place by as early as six weeks, when most women are still unaware of their pregnancy.

About the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Ruling

The Roe v. Wade is  ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in January 22, 1973, stating that

”Unduly restrictive state regulation of abortion is unconstitutional.”

.

Justice Harry A. Blackmun cited and wrote a majority opinion that a set of Texas state laws that criminalize abortion in most instances is a violation of a woman’s constitutional right of privacy;a right that is found implicit in the liberty guarantee of giving every person the right to seek due process as stated in the Fourteenth Amendment.

In the event that the Roe v. Wade is overturned or eroded, women of reproductive age in America stand to lose the ability to resort to abortion in their state.


Majority of Instagram users would want to have that massive Instagram following by gaining meer volgers since this would draw in more IG users to your profile who would also want to follow you on Instagram. Having a massive Instagram following would spark curiosity and interest in many IG users causing them to follow you thus making them a part of your following. This massive following could make you a name and a social media influencer to inspire change.

Because of the benefits of having a massive following on Instagram and other social media sites, political leaders are also now into social media to obtain followers and supporters, to inspire change, spread awareness regarding their political platforms, their political achievements, or to reach as many supporters during a political campaign.

Qualities That Makes A Good Political Leader

As electorates, making a decision on voting leaders into office shouldn’t be based on the number of followers the candidates have on their social media account. Votes must take into consideration the qualities of the political candidate. So, what qualities must a political candidate or leader have?

A Political Leader Is Honest

Honesty cultivates character, molds credibility and establishes trust. These are foundations to gain respect from constituents and the people around you.

A Political Leader Is Compassionate

Although a lot of individuals perceive compassion to be a weakness, genuine compassion is a quality that transforms knowledge into wisdom.  Political leaders possessing a sincere compassion make use of this quality to see and understand the needs and destitutions of the people as well as to settle on an action that would greatly benefit everyone involved.

A Political Leader Has Integrity

Political leaders with integrity could be trusted since they stand by and uphold their ethical and moral principles and do not deviate from them, even if doing so would greatly benefit them. It is vital for a leader to have the trust of their followers and this entails the utmost standard of uprightness or integrity.

These are just a few major qualities of what political leaders must possess to ensure that their motives are for the good of the people they lead and for the nation’s best interest.


What might be cost-effective and more practical by discovering it early, compared to preventing illness? Those assumptions are seriously questioned by two newspapers published and raise issues concerning the integrity of Obamacare’s bases.

The paper is all about prostate screening. The end result is that discovering tumors does not have any influence on well-being or the life of the people screened. This outcome relies upon a number of those prostate cancers found’s behavior. That cancer does not advance to cause any issues it seems. Healing them leads to no gain, and these tumors are found by screening, and significantly increased the price. Attempting to treat is equally as powerful. Obviously, this type of result is problematic for a lot of folks to take.

The next paper is all about mammography. This study questions mammography’s use in breast cancer mortality’s reduction. There has been an improvement in remedies, Though there was a decrease in breast cancer mortality because mammography is now widespread. The analysis questions the part of survival advantage which might be smaller than studies or reasoning imply.

Additional”preventative” measures, falsified by Obamacare, such as weight reduction and smoking cessation counseling, are also basically useless. Weight loss business and a powerful reception have determined Congress add education programs and counseling. Insurance businesses pay for these services will be expensive and of little advantage but the services being sold by those.

From a healthcare policy standpoint, the cash, time, and effort spent on those”preventative” measures will probably be wasted.  Why not include stomach or colon problems like gastroenterology practice in New Jersey, since most of the health problems are coming from what we eat and how we eat.
Evidence is hypocritically rejected by the backers of Obamacare if it doesn’t support their agenda. They are quick to take statistics that is borderline so as to malign treatments not incredibly popular. Actually, the signs relating to this operation isn’t conclusive, and lots of kids show a great advantage.

These policies signify the success of lobbying and politics. Obamacare isn’t about health but reveals the political and economic power of these constituencies hoping to control the bucks. The procedure has also eroded what little trust Congress held to the individuals. Costly, not able to fail, and unworthy, fanciful, not a fantastic outlook for Obamacare, or even America’s wellness.