Month: June 2019


What would the mattress of a billionaire be like? Probably the best mattress from a luxury brand store costing 9000 US dollars up or one that is custom made costing more than what a family from the lower brackets of society could earn for a year. Now what would the mattress of people from the lower brackets of society be like? Go on and search around the web, get out of the city, or look at the city’s alleys, what do you see? Some people are homeless, some are just barely getting by – they sleep on cardboard, on mats, or on the cold hard floor.

Being stuck in our own apartment room or in the comfort of our own subdivisions makes us forget the realities of the masses – the wealth gap is increasing. Major cities have alarming rates of homeless people, developing countries such as the Philippines are faced with problems on squatters and the homeless in the major urban areas while sleeping on mats or on the floor is a pretty common practice in the more provincial areas. Even countries known for being a home to billionaires such as Hong Kong are having alarming rates in the real estate Industry leading the general masses to have only a bed for a room or an illegal settlement with improper amenities – all these and a bill with astronomical prices just for a nights rest.

Having somewhere to sleep is a basic necessity but how come quite a number of the general public can’t have access to these basic necessities? For whose interests are the laws being enforced for? Why do we prioritize foreign businessmen or big businesses over the interest of the people? Why do we sell the lives of our citizens and of our motherland? Why are laws made to be confusing or made using the language that only the upper crust of society could understand? What does this imply to the general public for those who want to speak, for those who can’t speak. The wealth gap is increasing and even if most parts of the law couldn’t be understood by the masses, the laws made for the benefit of businessmen in the guise of politicians are reflected in the realities that the masses are experiencing in their everyday lives.


Beard on Politicians

The Atlantic interviewed Rebekah Herrick, an Oklahoma State University professor who analyzed the occurrence and revealed that the motive fewer than 5 percent of Congress have cosmetic hair really would be really they don’t wish to adopt a character which may make them seem conducive to women’s problems.

According to Herrick, this is not only politicians becoming paranoid. In her analysis, female subconsciously perceived politicians using beards and mustaches as being feminist, irrespective of their real voting habits.

So how can Paul Ryan and his beard fit into all this? The Atlantic factors to other research that replicate Herrick’s findings that beards are regarded as an indication of hyper-masculinity–although also observing that girls are demonstrated to locate guys with facial hair attractive. Because Paul Ryan has made no secret from his own stance on key women’s problems (specifically, his own urge to defund Planned Parenthood) perhaps he is just cutting him hoping he could endear girls with his eponymous facial hair rather? If you request, Appears to be a very long haul.

Effect on Image of Beard on Male Politicians

Using an experimental procedure, Herrick and her coworkers revealed individuals photos of similarly emerging politicians and with a beard, asking them how they felt about the guys and their probable places.

They discovered that politicians perceived guys with facial hair to become masculine and this is a sword that was mythical. Greater ratings of masculinity were connected with perceptions of proficiency but also worries the politicians were far less favorable to their worries.

To put it differently, the more beard and knows how to stimulate beard growth (bartwuchs anregen in German translation), the more people fear that a politician may be sexist.

Actually, facial hair does not have any connection to a man fighter’s voting record. They assessed. The study indicates, however, that guys in politics — perhaps even all guys — are smart to look closely at the stereotypes should they wish to affect how others view them.