Month: November 2019


The House impeachment proceedings led by Representative Adam Schiff has advanced to the stage of releasing transcripts of testimonies provided by witnesses via closed-door hearings; setting the stage for a public hearing in which Republicans will have a chance to question witnesses.

Trump’s “Read the Transcript” call could backfire against him, since his message may very well apply to the witness transcripts freshly released by the Schiff-led House Intelligence Committee.

Now Senator Lindsey Graham is trying to correct the potential damage that the “Read the Transcript” slogan could create on their attempt to defend Donald Trump. Senator Graham is now insisting that the transcripts are products of an illegal impeachment proceeding, and therefore not worth reading.

To substantiate his refusal to read the witness transcripts, Graham introduced a resolution stating that the ongoing impeachment proceeding is a witch hunt being carried out by Democrats to remove Trump from the Oval Office.

GOP Senators’ Backing of Lindsey Graham’s Resolution May Have Given Trump the Jitters

Graham’s resolution could have put Trump’s mind at rest, if all 53 Republican Senators signed the resolution, in the same way all Republican Representatives voted against the House’s impeachment resolution. However, it was not the case, since only 44 affixed their signature to Graham’s resolution.

The outcome means nine (9) Republican Senators are starting to “Read the Transcripts” of the impeachment witnesses rather than make final judgments based mainly on blind obedience to Donald Trump.

What Constitutional Scholars are Saying about Graham’s Resolution

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asserts, the impeachment proceeding was launched to defend the United States Constitution, which Donald Trump undermines by trying to legalize his abuse of presidential powers.

It is of interest therefore, to know what Constitutional Scholars are saying about Senator Graham’s resolution, to understand why nine GOP Senators refused to support it.

Laurence Tribe, a Professor of Constitutional Law and the Carl M. Loeb Professor of Harvard University told Newsweek that he has carefully examined the resolution to assess if any of Graham’s process complaints made historical, legal or moral sense. Yet he could not find anything in it that indicates defense of what the incumbent U.S. President has done; therefore, not worth being taken seriously

“Senator Graham’s resolution has absolutely no substance”

Harold Hongju Koh, Yale University’s Sterling Professor of International Law also told Newsweek that the due process protection being demanded by Graham, is attached only to the imminent Senate impeachment trial. Professor Koh continued by saying that since everyone knows that president Trump and his GOP loyalists will have ample opportunity to rebut the information gathered during the closed door hearings, he called Graham’s resolution

“A legally ignorant red herring.”

Frank Bowman, University of Missouri’s Floyd R. Gibson Endowed Professor of Law refuted in the Newsweek interview, Graham’s claim that the impeachment inquiry is not valid because the hearings are being carried out in secret. In truth, 40 Republican House members were in attendance during the hearings, all entitled to ask questions, all given equal time and allowed to bring along their staff members to assist them in asking questions.

“What Trump and the concurring Republican Senators are asking for, are procedural rights that are beyond those given to a defendant facing lengthy incarceration


A dog is intended to pull and yank some times. Should you try to prevent it from what nature intended? Is it even okay at the first place? Like most other dog owners, you are mostly likely confused concerning its role and the dog harness. Keep reading to find out more about the exploit, its applications, and benefits.

What’s a “No-Pull Harness?

Like many dog owners you most likely have come across harnesses, but have you ever noticed or thought of this“no-pull harness” ( https://pethm.com/no-pull-harness/ ). Well, a look at the market reveals that the harness is becoming quite popular on the marketplace. The harness contains straps that wrap around the front and rear of the puppy (leg area). There’s a ring that’s affixed at the dog’s chest. By gently pulling on the tap you retrain the dog.

What Are a Few of Its Uses?

Besides controlling the dog does the”no pull dog harness” have other applications? Yes, it will. It can help you train the dog in a manner. This is because it wraps around the back and front area of the dog. You will also find it suitable to control its weight when compared with the leash that is ordinary. You’re more likely to achieve good results if you apply the exploit consistently. This is why individuals are using it today.

You agree that restraining the dog can turned into a nightmare.

When he has become more powerful and bigger, this will occur. Can you even imagine stopping a dog from chasing hare or that squirrel out? Or would you ever think of your over-excited dog that is commanding to sit or stay calm? Certainly not! This is why you should quit straining your dog and yourself by obtaining a good”no pull dog harness”. Not only will you’ve got a simple time restraining your dog but additionally exercising and training .


Social movements may occur at societal or individual level. Both may be advocating either for radical or minor changes. This is the exact same reason why the government is not taking lightly these social movements under their sovereignty. Because in just a small move, it could be enough to trigger mass movement among the general public.

As a matter of fact, there are several kinds of social movements that politicians are watching out for and these are the following:

Social Movement

This is in reference to a big group of people who are widely organized in resisting or promoting social change. Social movement is usually based on couple of factors:

  1. The movement is attempting to change
  2. How much change the movement seeks to advocate

Social movements may occur at any person or at societal level and it could advocate either for radical or minor changes. You may see social movement in form of protesters.

After all, it is fairly easy to host such events given that the materials needed can be easily sourced from online stores like in Firmajulegaver.

Redemptive Social Movement

In relation to this one, it is seeking complete personal transformation and is usually religious in nature. A prime example for redemptive social movement is the spread of Christianity.

Missionaries were able to spread Christianity from the days of Roman Empire. Missionaries from Byzantine Empire had brought Orthodox Christianity to Russia. Then in Asia during the medieval times, missionaries have persuaded to convert as far as China and India. Among early missionaries, Catholics who travelled to South and Central America seeks conversion of its native people.

Reformative Social Movement

When it comes to reformative social movement, this is seeking change to specifics on how society is functioning.

The movement of obtaining marriage rights as well as benefits for same-sex is a good example for reformative social movement. This movement all started in the 70s but it then became a lot more prominent in American politics back in 1993. This was when the Hawaiian Supreme Court has declared the prohibition of the state to become unconstitutional.

Throughout the 21st century, the public has supported to legalize same-sex marriage and since then on, it considerably grown and several national polls have been conducted since 2011. It showed that a big number of Americans have supported same-sex marriage. As a result, you would be seeing a number of states in US and countries in the world that are supporting such.


The late Tip O’Neill (Leader of the United States Democratic House of Representatives) is acknowledged with the informative statement that “all nation-wide politics is local”, indicating a politician’s very first concern is generally about how a specific proposition should impact their re-election performance.

Politics 2 0 Transportation

Self-perpetuation and Self-preservation have already been the most prevalent denominators for people in politics since the beginning.

The argument over mass fast public transit and travel, along with private car movement, is definitely littered with open public pronouncements great intentions and abandoned guarantees shortly afterward. Surely, with today’s growing personal transport such as hover boards, there will be a continuous battle as to whether it should be allowed on the streets or not.

Should all of us build even more roads or even more public transportation?

If even more roads, the type? Highways, freeways or local roads? With or without tolls?

In the event that more general population transit, what style? Subways, vehicles or streetcars (now LRTs)? Who will spend?

As Mike Cass, the previous Metropolitan Toronto transportation officials said in the early 1970s, we need a well-balanced system of the two. It’s not much more the various other.

One of the fanciest examples of political self-interest and, some might say, spinelessness in traveling planning, was your cancellation in the Spadina Highway by then first-year premier Expenses Davis four decades ago.

This following the Conservative regional authorities were faced by an organized “Stop Spadina” people’s uprising.

In my opinion among Davis’ inspirations meant for stopping Spadina, revolved around the political luck of the past due to Allan Grossman, who kept the town center Toronto using St Andrew designed for the Lover folks.

A capable cabinet resort chef, Grossman wrestled it away from Later on Salsberg, a Communist MPP who continued to be loyal towards the cause in spite of Russian atrocities against Jews, which various Jewish arrêters found insupportable.

Whatever Davis’ motives, his capitulation upon Spadina, eliminating the highway at Eglinton Ave., brought on some of the most severe traffic congestion Barcelone had ever before seen and created gridlock problems that always this day.

Randomly killing that which was supposed to be a relief control device for site visitors coming into the downtown key from the northwestern part of the Higher Toronto Region, as the Don Area Parkway was intended to the actual same inside the northeast, acquired immediate unfavorable consequences.

Initially, it improved traffic congestion in the northwestern GTA.

Virtual parking lot

Second, this turned the DVP into the virtual building it continues to be to this day during the rush time, discouraging for all those but virtually all patients of drivers, or perhaps those with no commuting alternatives.

Another misdirected political decision occurred if the Toronto Transportation Commission’s Streetcar Elimination System was halted in its songs by a great alliance of local residents and aldermen (now councilors) delaying the sensible changeover to subways and buses capable of maneuvering easier in traffic.

Unfortunately, the streetcar enthusiasts prevailed and motorists are actually stuck at the rear of slow shifting and frequently handicapped streetcars and LRTs inside the downtown main.

Now, the town council can be considered a King Streets traffic minimization plan providing priority to streetcars and pedestrians more than cars, in order to should be taking a look at Queen Avenue and how to total the prepared subway along with it, connecting it with all the long-awaited downtown relief collection.

There are many different examples of immediate thinking and aborted flow plans needing a 50- to 100-year vision, including completing the Sheppard subway.

The real concern facing Barcelone is not really roads compared to transit.

It ought to be both, with realistic financing and funding mechanisms for the purpose of the construction and operation with the integrated method of travel networks required to solve the congestion issues.


The Popularity of Video Games

With today’s advancement of technology, video games are one of those products of technology that benefit a lot from the said advances. More than a decade ago, most of us probably tried playing video games with a very low quality graphics. But as years went by, video games evolved to game with a very nice graphics, can be played with two or more players, and most importantly very accessible.

Nowadays, developers found a way for us to play video games anytime, anywhere as long as we have our electronic devices and internet connection. Moreover, various social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. But those games that are more advanced can be played  by registering in a certain site or by purchasing the game online. Either way, playing video io games has become more accessible.

Video games to raise Political Concerns

Playing video games is not only a form of entertainment or a way to kill time, it has also become a great way to raise issues and awareness on a certain topic such as how to go green, and even current political issues. In the present times, developers are focusing more on inventing games that offers the later one because apparently, almost every country all over the world is struggling with political systems. It is only necessary to take initiatives that promotes making the political system more organized and less corrupt.

Game developers believe that one way to address this is to develop a game that will inform every player of the current political status or at least how an unorganized government system runs.

The Importance of Raising Political Awareness

The problem in today’s society is that most of us are not fully aware on what is currently happening on our government. We almost all the depend on the media only, which is most of the time bias.

Another reason why politics is being incorporated in playing video games is that, politics is kind of complex to include in secondary curriculum and playing video games is usually every kid’s favorite hobby. Hence, incorporating politics in video games may be a great way for a kid to be aware on what politics is.