Month: July 2020


TV News Anchor

We’re living through a time of especially combative media-politics connections, driven mostly from the Trump presidency along with the continuing “fake news” discussion. However, as we were reminded by an ABC Rear View documentary anxiety or hostility between journalists and politicians is far from fresh.

For years, in every single state with a free and independent press, the 2 classes have danced around each other such as unwilling suitors. As everything goes pear-shaped There’s been intermittent bursts of rips, sulking, and name-calling.

In fact, the two teams need another.

Politicians want the press to communicate with taxpayers. Media organizations rely on as a source of comment and information. The further media sockets and programs have proliferated — to this stage where people occupy a news civilization with influence and international reach — even that the more the connection becomes.

It required quite a while for politicians to wake up to the simple fact that, as well as their key civic purpose since the Fourth Estate, press businesses may be an ally in governmental communication. About looking on shows such as hybrids like The undertaking, or even the ABC’s Q&A, several politicians have been reluctant sniffy.

They watched primetime public functionality since dumbed-down politics. Failure was feared by others in platforms that were vulnerable when apps went out.

But viewers’ expectations have shifted with the slow decrease of deference towards political elites, which started in the 1960s. It has grown into a necessity for the fighter to interact with citizens in the areas where they’re. The interaction is the era’s assembly or effort hustings, but at the living space on your sofa (check out cheap sectional sofas under 500), about the TV, and also on networking.

Occasionally, like in Q&A, taxpayers are physically within the stadium, asking questions and making comments. While media functionality brings benefits concerning coverage and promotion marketing, to be viewed to operate scared from involvement can harm a politician.

The former British prime minister, Tony Blair, was great at this as was Australia’s former prime minister, Kevin Rudd, that emerged as a possible leader because of his obvious likeability on breakfast TV.

Tony Abbott came on Q&A, as did his treasurer, Joe Hockey, just to drop out together using the ABC above its journalism and lead his ministers into boycott Q&A. It wasn’t a call, though his premiership is not anything to go by.

From the electronic era, when crowds are fragmenting and diversifying across TV, radio, online, and (nevertheless) printing systems, an ambitious fighter gets more chances to create a splash than previously.

 

Also Read: The Relationship between the Media and The Government

 

Hard-hitting journalistic formats like ABC’s 7.30 and RN Drive stay crucial platforms for politicians to declare and defend their own policies. Malcolm Turnbull has embraced an approach that was more energetic. Over half of his press interviews within his first six months as prime minister had been awarded to the ABC.

Commercial radio talkback applications like the ones helmed from Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, and Paul Murray will also be significant places for older politicians to achieve their audience. However, they do hazard a bollocking if they don’t see things the speaker’s manner.

Jones famously announced, in some period after Turnbull was boycotting the series, that”nobody has won an election not looking on my schedule”. Few politicians have the guts to prevent the behemoths of Australian radio, although this type of link is difficult to establish.
When the aforementioned are inquisitorial, frequently critical examples of this standard Estate purpose of the social media, politicians are seeking a “milder” manner of media participation.

They like to get invited onto The undertaking, as an instance, understanding they might be softly satirized as a member of this series’s “infotainment” ethos. But they are also able to be permitted to demonstrate the other, more human aspect of the character than they could when batting off tough queries from Leigh Earnings at 7.30.

Since US president, Barack Obama won a lot of hearts and hearts with his looks at Jon Stewart’s Daily Show. Tony Abbott appeared on Big Brother in their own election effort that was powerful 2013. In targeting some portion of the electorate that is inclined to listen he had been judged to have achieved.

ABC’s Kitchen Cabinet is now recognized as a top political media structure, using its national setting and human-interest strategy to that which makes politicians tick. Its viewers’ evaluations signify that people love this way of material. Maybe audiences see it as introducing a valuable insight into the “real” man behind the conventional political rhetoric.

As seen most dramatically with Donald Trump’s authorities by discussion, the growth of social networking has opened a completely different sphere of electronic communication which bypasses the Large Media platforms of TV and radio. The latter control, and reach crowds that are larger than the tweet or Facebook article.

The challenge to TV and the radio manufacturers is to invent political material formats — Toilet Cabinet being one outstanding instance, the Job another — which combine the range of conventional broadcasting together with all the modern audience requirement for access to this actual, the real, the individual inside their political agents.


Animal welfare activists in America are now focused on the country’s horse racing meets, as they are seeking political support to have the sport abolished. The movement began in California last year when a significant number of horse deaths transpired at the Santa Anita Park.

 

Horse Racing and Horse Deaths as a Result of Racing Injury

Horseracing Wrong a New-York based animal rights group has started calling for a nationwide ban on horse racing sport. The calls began when they started looking into the 2018-2019 6-months winter meet in Santa Anita Park, which resulted in the deaths of 30 horses. The California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) said it already had the Santa Anita race track in its radars, because at an average, 50 horse deaths per year has been occurring at the track since 2008 to 2018.

Immediately when “American Currency” the 30th race horse was euthanized after suffering a leg injury in Santa Anita’s race track, the CHRB called for an inspection of the race course. Events during the first 3 weeks of March had to be suspended in order to make way for renovations. In addition, several safety protocols were introduced at the park in order to address the increasing number of equine fatalities.

In reacting to the series of horse deaths at the Santa Anita Park, California Governor Gavin Newsom directed the Santa Anita owners and the CHRB to create a 5-member “safety review team.” The team comprises veterinarians and stewards tasked to evaluate all horses participating in Santa Anita’s races. The review team has been conferred with the authority to exclude or scratch a horse from a race event, in case concerns arise over the animal’s conditions and fitness to participate.

Yet Horseracing Wrong said that they have their sight set on the abolition of the sport, and not only in the races being held by the Santa Anita Park. Animal activist April Montgomery said they intend to end horse racing, starting with California. The plan is to bring the issue to the ballot box, which suggests convincing Californians to give their votes to public officials and lawmakers who will legislate laws that will abolish horse racing sport.

It Might Take Long for the Advocacy to Gain Traction

Many opine that the abolition of horse racing in California or throughout the country has far reaching effects, which will make it difficult for the movement to garner support and gain traction. Shutting down the industry will leave many race track workers without jobs, while state governments will have to deal with diminished sources of tax revenues. More so now that state governments are reeling from the devastating economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The publisher of the article BloodHorse – From Print to Digital Masterpiece – Past The Wire, which also sponsored this guest post, had recently reported that Santa Anita Park has already been cleared by the LA Dept. of Public Health, as testing of workers and jockeys have yielded negative results.

Since May 15, horse racing events have already resumed after the LA County Dept. of Public Health shut race tracks down last March 27, 2020. However, the resumed race events took place without spectators. That alone already reduced the pool of prizes at stake, which also meant the government will get to collect reduced taxes.


It may come to a surprise but the oil and gas industry has been battling recession since the onset of Global Financial Crisis more than a decade ago. Every year, the volume of production increased by more than global demand – meaning to say, the market has been experiencing a decline, with lower prices for natural gas and crude oil.

Throughout this period, the US gas and shale oil production dominated the increase in which it helped in transforming the US economy and eventually became the biggest global producer of energy sources. In the background though, traditional leaders in the market such as Russia and Saudi Arabia have been outgrown but they’re now planning to take the control of oil market from the United States back. And the outbreak creates the perfect opportunity in leveling the field.

It Shook the Industry for Sure

In these unprecedented times, it opens various power struggles worldwide. Right at this point in time, we’re in deep in recession and even at the edge of experiencing global depression.

The catalyst is when Covid-19 turned from a simple virus in a small province in China to a global pandemic affecting over 6 million people worldwide. We haven’t seen such collapse in oil demand for the longest time. What coronavirus has done is stopping a big part of the world from travelling from:

  • Air
  • Sea and;
  • Ground

This directly impacted oil demand and countries that are primarily in this sector.

It’s inevitable that both Russia and Saudi Arabia continues their battle of gaining control of global oil market back from US. The driving factor of Saudi Arabia and Russia is regaining market share in a stage where outlook is for weak demands. We are now in stage of market consolidation like what we’ve seen in luxury goods, consumer products, food as well as in automobile industry. Today, we are being surrounded by industries which are managed by few players and this will continue for years in oil.

Can the US Keep Momentum?

However, United States had the edge of being the global power with immense hard and soft power at their disposal. Thing is, US power peaked and now has fewer options in their arsenal. Obviously, they could impose oil import tariffs to protect domestic gas and oil industry but the question is, will it make a difference?

As a matter of fact, this topic is expounded by different YouTube videos online especially by those who opt to buy YouTube views cheap.